On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Irek Szczesniak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Cedric Blancher > <[email protected]> wrote: >> David, I have to agree with Olga that the new names, i.e. >> .sh.sig.value.q and .sh.sig.value.Q are not very useful - they lack at >> least the self-describing nature and alienate the users of other >> platforms like C/C++, perl, python and likely others. >> >> But I understand your concern about the name "ptr" too, so lets try >> with Olga's palm leave solution and use .sh.sig.value.objref. >> >> Patch is attached. > > I agree with Cedric. Either keep .sh.sig.value.int+.sh.sig.value.ptr > to retain commonality with other languages (C/C++, perl, python, maybe > even more) or - as alternative - use Cedric's solution in the patch. >
I'd prefer .sh.sig.value.int and .sh.sig.value.ptr to keep the API identical across platforms and programming languages. Josh _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
