On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 September 2013 10:49, Wendy Lin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a request about LC_OPTIONS=unicode. I believe the name >> 'unicode' is too generic > > +1 > >> and should better describe what it does. >> The first patch from Roland Mainz I saw used set -o convunicode, for >> "convert to unicode". I think this, or 'convunicodeliterals', would be >> a more fitting and descriptive name. > > "convunicodeliterals" is too long. Either "unicodeliterals" or > "convunicode" would do it nicely :)
I'd prefer unicodeliterals, but would accept convunicode, too. Just unicode is too generic. But I am also concerned about Olga's comment about print -C to print compound variables using such literals. How do we do that without tinkering with LC_OPTIONS each time? Add -U/+U as requested by Olga? Irek _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
