I think it created the hard link itself:
danny@danny-ubuntu ~/wrk/ksh/ast-ksh.2014-06-25/arch/linux.i386-64/bin
$ ls -li bash ksh
934962 -rwxrwxr-x 2 danny danny 1984736 Jul 1 10:32 bash
934962 -rwxrwxr-x 2 danny danny 1984736 Jul 1 10:32 ksh
On 10 July 2014 13:36, David Korn <dgk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you link ksh93 to bash and run this version of bash? ksh93 has to
> emulate bash to be able to run the bash functions since there are a few
> incompatibilities.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Danny Weldon <danny.wel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I had these errors when I tried out completion on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS.
>>
>> It typed "git he" and pressed tab to see if it would complete the word
>> "help":
>>
>>
>> $ ./bash -l
>> bash: warning: shell level (5404176) too high, resetting to 1
>> danny@danny-ubuntu ~/wrk/ksh/ast-ksh.2014-06-25/arch/linux.i386-64/bin
>> $ git he<tab>
>>
>> This is what happens next (btw, it backspaced over the 'e'):
>>
>> $ git hbash: _upvars: cword: invalid option
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[3]: add: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[4]: get-tar-commit-id: not found [No such
>> file or directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[5]: reflog: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: grep: no pattern
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[7]: relink: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[8]: am: not found [No such file or directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[9]: gui: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[10]: remote: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[11]: annotate: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>> ./bash: _git[22803]: compgen[12]: apply: not found [No such file or
>> directory]
>>
>> (Many more similar errors after this)
>>
>> On 5 July 2014 09:33, Dan Douglas <orm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > "FUNCNAME" might be good to have because it's related to "BASH_SOURCE"
>> > in a
>> > similar manner as ".sh.fun" and ".sh.file".
>> >
>> > I tried implementing FUNCNAME using the debugger. The trouble is
>> > expanding
>> > "${FUNCNAME[@]}". The hack on the last line makes it sort-of work by
>> > pushing
>> > new elements on the end during expansion, but then it can't shrink.
>> >
>> > function FUNCNAME.get {
>> > nameref self=${.sh.name}
>> > if (( .sh.subscript < .sh.level )); then
>> > trap "(( .sh.level -= .sh.subscript + 1 )); eval '(( .sh.level =
>> > ${.sh.level} ))' \; _=\${.sh.fun}" DEBUG
>> > trap - DEBUG;
>> > fi
>> >
>> > (( .sh.subscript < .sh.level - 2 )) && self[.sh.subscript + 1]=
>> > }
>> >
>> > Still lots of goodies in RELEASE I've yet to play with.
>> > --
>> > Dan Douglas
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ast-developers mailing list
>> > ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
>> > http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>
>> Danny
>> _______________________________________________
>> ast-developers mailing list
>> ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
>> http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
>
>
--
Regards
Danny
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@lists.research.att.com
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
