-- Glenn Fowler --
Thanks for responding.
whatever you used to download the tgz gunzip'd it without telling you
the md5sum of the gunzip'd tarball is
3ca43501a73a0312e533d03f67e5bd41
I've seen internet explorer do this
-- Glenn Fowler -- AT&T Research, Florham Park NJ --
Re: ast-ksh.2008-02-02.tgz source code
However, this is exactly the same md5sum I get when I run md5 command on the
tarball after downloading (all done on FreeBSD 6.2 Unix like system). The
concern is that this md5sum that we both get, is NOT the same as what is posted
on the download web page.
More detailed description follows -
The web page:
http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/cgi-bin/download.cgi?action=list&name=ast-ksh
link for: ast-ksh.2008-02-02.tgz source code
shows a different md5sum. That is the concern I have. Since you get the same md5sum that I get
3ca43501a73a0312e533d03f67e5bd41
then I am wondering if the ast-ksh.2008-02-02.tgz file on the server has been
compromised or if the web page showing is showing the incorrect md5sum
d2a71e320fbaa7a0fd950a27c7e4b099
and wrong file size of: 1686309 ?
Note: FreeBSD (ver 6.2) Ports package is expecting the following:
md5sum: d2a71e320fbaa7a0fd950a27c7e4b099
tarball size: 1686309
tarball name: ast-ksh.2008-02-02.tgz
This seems to agree with what the web page (www.research.att.com, server) says
the md5sum and tarball size should be. Therefore something changed. If the
tarball is in fact good and uncompromised then please let met know. In that
case, how do I report such erroneous md5sum and file size?
Mark Tague
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
