OK.

Michal, you may want to look at our Errata items #002-013 and consider
taking them into Fedora, too.
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~fleyta/on_posix_utility_update2_20100416_008/
has test suite modules for each Sun bug fixed (this is a QA rule that
all bugs for the default system shell (i.e. /bin/sh = ksh93) in
Opensolaris must have a test suite module), too.

Olga

2010/4/20 Siddhesh Poyarekar <[email protected]>:
> 2010/4/20 ольга крыжановская <[email protected]>:
>> Michal, is the the same bug as Errata #012 in
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~fleyta/on_posix_utility_update2_20100416_008/raw_files/new/usr/src/lib/libshell/misc/ERRATA.txt?
>>
>> Sun has logged this as
>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6942280
>>
>
> Yes, the fix is functionally the same as the one Michal posted. Can't
> tell much from the problem description  in the bug report since the
> attached tarball is not available.
>
> --
> Siddhesh Poyarekar
> http://siddhesh.in
>



-- 
      ,   _                                    _   ,
     { \/`o;====-    Olga Kryzhanovska   -====;o`\/ }
.----'-/`-/     [email protected]   \-`\-'----.
 `'-..-| /     Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer   \ |-..-'`
      /\/\                                     /\/\
      `--`                                      `--`

_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to