I've seen the same kind of stack tract with our poll plugin.

Olga

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Finnbarr Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plugins appear to have stopped working in the latest release of ksh93
> - at least on 64-bit Linux.
>
> Here is a very simple crude  "HelloWorld" example of a plugin:
> #include <stdio.h>
> int
> b_hello(int argc, char *argv[], void *extra)
> {
>      if (argc != 2) {
>          fprintf(stderr,"Usage: hello arg\n");
>          return(2);
>     }
>     printf("Hello %s\n", argv[1]);
>     return(0);
> }
> which is built as follows:
> gcc -fPIC -g -c hello.c
> gcc -shared -W1,-soname,libhello.so -o libhello.so hello.o
> Works fine on ksh83 Version JM 93t+ 2010-03-05 and earlier
> $ ./ksh
> $ echo ${.sh.version}
> Version JM 93t+ 2010-03-05
> $ builtin -f ./libhello.so hello
> $ hello world
> Hello there world
> $
> but core dumps on later versions of ksh93
> $ /bin/ksh
> $ echo ${.sh.version}
> Version JM 93t+ 2010-06-21
> $  builtin -f ./libhello.so hello
> Memory fault(coredump)
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  dllplugin (lib=0x0, name=0x177c531 "./libhello.so",
>     ver=<value optimized out>, rel=20100528, flags=1, path=0x0, size=0)
>     at /usr/src/debug/ksh-20100621/src/lib/libdll/dllplug.c:82
> 82 if (!dllcheck(dll, dle->path, rel))
> Extensive work was recently done in libdll.  New source code
> files include dlllib.h, dllcheck.c, dllerror.c, dllplug.c.
> Is there now a requirement to have a version number on a plugin?
> Do plugins need to be build differently?
> - Finnbarr
> _______________________________________________
> ast-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
>
>



-- 
      ,   _                                    _   ,
     { \/`o;====-    Olga Kryzhanovska   -====;o`\/ }
.----'-/`-/     [email protected]   \-`\-'----.
 `'-..-| /       http://twitter.com/fleyta     \ |-..-'`
      /\/\     Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer   /\/\
      `--`                                      `--`
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to