David,
What is your position on this change in behavior?
1. The ksh-93s behavior is a bug, and it is fixed in the latest versions,
or
2. the old behavior is the desired behavior, and the new versions have a
bug.
Thanks,
Herbert.
On 07/28/2011 08:25 AM, Herbert van den Bergh wrote:
On 7/28/11 6:46 AM, David Korn wrote:
It looks like typeset -u -n used to work in 93s, but has been broken
since 93t. Is this expected, or a bug?
Did you mean
typeset -u -i
for unsigned integer? The -n option means name reference and doesn't
work with other options.
No, I meant typeset -u -n. As you can see in the example, it did work
in previous ksh versions. It converts the referenced name to
uppercase. Any particular reason this behavior was removed?
Thanks,
Herbert.
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
