On 10 May 2012 05:04, Dan Shelton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 May 2012 18:04, David Korn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> cc:  [email protected] [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Re: [ast-developers] RFE: Extend ksh93 printf %q to accept 
>> modifiers
>> --------
>>
>>
>>> David, FYI: The C99 extensions for decimal floating point specify the
>>> new printf formats %Hf, %Df and %DDf for decimal floating point
>>> datatypes _Decimal32, _Decimal64 and _Decimal64 (these will become
>>> mandatory for the next C standard, including printf %Hf, %Df and %DDf
>>> formats). If AST wants to remain POSIX conform ant then %H for HTML
>>> has to be depreciated in favor of a different %<letter>. My preference
>>> would be the %(html)q proposal.
>>>
>>> Irek
>>>
>>
>> This is good to know.  Since H is a modifier, if it is not followed by f,
>> I could continue to treat it as %H for backward compatibility.
>> I plan to add the %(xxx)q formats in ksh93v.
>
> I have a request:
> Could you add %(html)q and %(xml)q for ksh93u to ease the transition
> period, please?
> Or send patches to do the same to this list for vendors to pick up who
> may need it, please.

David?

_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to