On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Cedric Blancher > <cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 13 October 2012 16:40, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote: >>> ast-ksh 2012-10-12 alpha posted >> >> LGTM (looks good to me), but od and tr are missing. We use the >> combination of od+head+tail and ~(X) to classify binary files and tr >> for quick&dirty conversion jobs (like dos2unix and Japanese >> processing). > > (Stupid ?!) question (mostly for Glenn): Is AST "tr" aware of > multibyte characters ?
Sigh... this was really a braindead question... I confused&&mixed-up Solaris /usr/bin/tr with AST tr. Solaris /usr/bin/tr is a mess and doesn't support multibyte characters nor does it comply with any POSIX/SUS standards or sanity... while AST tr is at least conforming to POSIX+sanity+XPG4... and AFAIK the only missing bit for XPG6 conformance is the "-C" option... ... sorry for the mess... it's 1:00h AM here... ;-( ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers