On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Cedric Blancher
> <cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 13 October 2012 16:40, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote:
>>> ast-ksh 2012-10-12 alpha posted
>>
>> LGTM (looks good to me), but od and tr are missing. We use the
>> combination of od+head+tail and ~(X) to classify binary files and tr
>> for quick&dirty conversion jobs (like dos2unix and Japanese
>> processing).
>
> (Stupid ?!) question (mostly for Glenn): Is AST "tr" aware of
> multibyte characters ?

Sigh... this was really a braindead question... I confused&&mixed-up
Solaris /usr/bin/tr with AST tr. Solaris /usr/bin/tr is a mess and
doesn't support multibyte characters nor does it comply with any
POSIX/SUS standards or sanity... while AST tr is at least conforming
to POSIX+sanity+XPG4... and AFAIK the only missing bit for XPG6
conformance is the "-C" option...
... sorry for the mess... it's 1:00h AM here... ;-(

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers

Reply via email to