On 8.7.2013 16:34, Roland Mainz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Michal Hlavinka <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8.7.2013 12:43, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Michal Hlavinka <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 8.7.2013 08:15, Dan Shelton wrote:
I'm trying to comprehend this: The ksh93 version in Fedora 19 is a
year old. Does anyone know why?
simple answer, because it's latest stable release. KSH in Fedora
{17,18,19,rawhide} is 2012-08-01 with some backported fixes.
There is no newer stable release. There is no newer beta release.
FYI ast-ksh.20130628 with Roland's fixes for Solaris is *stable*.
1) our tests does not share this opinion (I did not try Roland's fixes)
Erm... which issues did you find ? Email, please... and much and many
as you can... we can't fix what we can't see... ;-/
For example, the one reported in
[ast-developers] ksh 2013-02-14+ can't build itself
is still valid. I still need to use extra patch for ksh 2013-02-14+ to
be able to build itself.
I'm planing to run all tests and mail my findings soon, but I have to
prepare ksh update for rhel right now.
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
