I see there's nothing after my last reply. Did this problem report make it onto a bug list to get investigated/fixed?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Quentin Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Some people have had trouble following my original report. I've > since figured out a simpler example to show the problem, and I'll > use "<TAB>" notation instead of ^I, which seemed to confuse people > people as well. > > This problem does reproduce with the alpha ksh. Here's the latest > directions using just two files in a directory: > > $ set -o emacs > $ echo $KSH_VERSION > Version AIJM 93v- 2013-07-18 > $ ls > JHS_REFRESH-1.txt JHS_REFRESH-A.txt > $ ls JHS<TAB> > > Now this TAB key completes the line to: > $ ls JHS_REFRESH- > > So far so good. > > Now at this point if you type an 'A' key then the <TAB> key you get: > $ ls JHS_REFRESH-A.txt > > However, if instead you type a '1' key then the <TAB> key you get: > $ ls JHS_REFRESH-1 > 1) JHS_REFRESH-1.txt > $ ls JHS_REFRESH-1 > > > This difference in behavior is a bug with the numeric key, correct? _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
