Subject: Re: Re: [ast-users] getting the size of a file
--------

> I think it's still unfortunate that there is no portable** stat(2)
> equivalent in ksh93.
> --More--
> ** portable, as in, no need to compile/link a special library, or
> other extraordinary means; ie, standard builtin.
> 

Maybe when types are added to ksh93, I will have some types builtin.

David Korn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users

Reply via email to