Ok. So let me see if I have this right. 

ksh93s refers to the last stable release of ksh93s. The first release
that brought about ksh93s was probably was something like ksh93s
2007-01-13 or something like that.  However there may be a ksh93s+
which is the stable ksh93s plus bug fixes. So when folks say you
should be using ksh93s or better the mean ksh93s, or ksh93s+ but not
ksh93 and a date. But currently for ksh93t we should say ksh93t
2008-09-26 or something like that.

It is possible that ksh93t may be the last stable release although
it's also possible there may be a ksh93u, but not a jump like Python
2.{5,6,7} to Python 3000 or Ruby 1.9.{0,1,2} to Ruby 2.0 (which Matz
describes as currently "vaporware")

David Korn writes:
 > Subject: Re: ksh93t and version numbering (Was Re: [ast-users] ksh93t 
 > 2008-09-26  beta src)
 > --------
 > 
 > > This reminds me - how exactly does version numbering work? I realize
 > > there is currently ksh93t and what looks like a date. And it appears
 > > like something like this happened for ksh93s. What is the final
 > > version of the current series going to be called? For example is there
 > > a contemplated ksh93u or ksh09a?
 > > 
 > 
 > If there are major changes in the code, then I will move to a new letter.
 > In this case, the major change was the addition of types for object
 > oriented scripting.  The suffix - means that the version is unstable
 > like an alpha version.  Without a suffix means that the release is
 > pretty stable and is soaking in the field.  The releases with a +
 > are usually bug fixes added to the stable version.
 > 
 > If I make a version that works with multiple threads, then it would
 > become a new version like 'u'.   I don't know whether there will
 > be any version after t+ or not.  Another posibility for a 'u'
 > release is an enhanced arithmetic package allowing user define
 > functions and complex variables.   However, it is possible that
 > a 'u' release will be a recoding of portions of the shell for
 > performance enhancements.
 > 
 > Note that this is not an exact science and that there has been
 > almost one letter change per year since ksh93 was released.
 > 
 > 
 > David Korn
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > _______________________________________________
 > ast-users mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
 > 
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users

Reply via email to