cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Re: [ast-users] Where does POSIX say `...` is obsolete? --------
> David, can you confirm? > > Olga > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Finnbarr Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > The current POSIX standard does not say that `...` is obsolete. See Section > > 2.6.3 Command Substitution > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18 > _06_03 > > > > - Finnbarr > > > >> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:48:15 +0100 > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [ast-users] Where does POSIX say `...` is obsolete? > >> > >> Where can I find the part of the POSIX standard which declares `...` > >> as obsolete and $(...) should be used instead? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ast-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users > > > > > > > > -- > , _ _ , > { \/`o;====- Olga Kryzhanovska -====;o`\/ } > .----'-/`-/ [email protected] \-`\-'----. > `'-..-| / Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer \ |-..-'` > /\/\ /\/\ > `--` `--` > I don't have the rationalle in front of me, but I thought that it said it in the rationalle and explained the reason for adding $(...). The KornShell Command and Programming Language book lists it as obsolete. I believe that all the examples in the standard use $(...), not `...`. David Korn [email protected] _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
