On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:16:30 +0200 Michal Hlavinka wrote: > On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 00:08:12 Glenn Fowler wrote: > > the AT&T Software Technology ast beta 2010-10-10 source release > > has been posted to the download site > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/beta/
> Is it expected that beta version passes all shtests? yes, but it is beta, so there may be some system specific differences that have not been handled > Odd is when I start tests manualy all of them works, but when started > automaticaly during the rpm build process they fail. I'll try to find out > what's the difference. how are the tests run in the rpm build process vs. manually? > > locale.sh[269]: LANG change not seen by function -- expected > $'(libshell,3,46)\nAn error occurred.\n(libshell,3,46)' or > $'(debug,message,libshell,"An error occurred.")\nAn error occurred. > \n(debug,message,libshell,"An error occurred.")', got > $'(debug,message,libshell,An error occurred.)\nAn error occurred. > \n(debug,message,libshell,An error occurred.)' we are aware of this one it has to do with how the shell handles $"..." strings returned from the message catalog, in particular " inside those strings it will be fixed in the next beta thanks _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
