-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/2010 2:15 PM, David Korn wrote: > Subject: Re: [ast-users] Is this a bug? -------- > >> Or am I doing (or expecting?) something wrong? > Yes, you are using name() to define functions rather than function > name. name() functions do not create local variables since POSIX > does not define local variables. Change each of them and try > again. Ah POSIX. Got it. Does it forbid it? I've only stuck with name() because it's the least common denominator. 'function name' doesn't work in /bin/sh. But then again neither does 'typeset'. Andthese days /bin/sh, is more likely to be either bash or ksh93, so I guess it's time to move. >> Am I nuts? > Good chance you are. Maybe less so now.... Nah who am I kidding! Thanks! -Kyle >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Kyle >> > > David Korn [email protected] > _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing > list [email protected] > https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM2vGfAAoJEEADRM+bKN5wqxMIAKEfscN+X1YsDTv2o8qdNuk1 75zMa7sj+zTEqSlp4xYM0f6o2icH7Dj9JNbXfqxBoroqvPp34geayB3c3kLcRS9/ rrittmBKhcVHGB5gklEAO/ixO30qujvazfKV6S9pW2qDuyJAZiYOMhr3siKRCyzR EdFaSrkqHhTltdmn9/XZFA7YcffQPrOOdi1Cxou9OO8x2kFVjwcR5JaxJnWyASqV lo86UI4w1gZ9UBP7dB8VkLSuUt0Cg/kcTay8Q1MbFUphlfn72uFJQXU35JMo8+w8 LWwa/T2NjQvgAzgpviDdKmKV7HQ0jrvw9sAnk4lF+s5Q8tBGEMz8dSQRUSY/fXg= =k1V2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
