Subject: Re: [ast-users] ksh93: Shell Benchmarks -------- > Hi All, > > The question of replacing the default shell in NetBSD "base" with > something else has comeup. Naturally, being the ksh93 enthusiast > that I am I suggested we use ksh93. I am hoping to find some > shell code that I could use to benchmark the various shells (ksh93, > mksh, zsh, ...). I am hoping to show that, on average, ks93 has > superior performance to these other shells. Can someone > point me in the right direction? > > Thanks, > Kent
Here is a URL for a talk I have a couple of years ago. Slides 17 and 18 have performance numbers. I don't have mksh since I wasn't familiar with it then. I can get you the tests if you want to run them. This was ksh93s+. The current version is ksh93u and a type system was added in ksh93t. https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dqwmc5b_0fpv6h5 David Korn [email protected] _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
