Hi!

  I've just installed the latest (2011-02-08) linux.i386-64 binary release of 
ast-base, set up a couple of machines in 'local', then tried to get 'hostname' 
to run via coshell.  All status commands work properly, daemons are started 
where they're supposed to be, &c, but any form of coshell -r (whether command 
line or interactive) dumps core like so:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff796819f in sfvprintf () from /work/jack/ast/bin/../lib/libast.so
(binary package without debug symbols, so that's all I have from GDB)

  Here's the output I get with debug set to 10:

$ coshell -d 10 -r <host>
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=1
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=4 next=0 fd=0 
status=000201
coshell [cs library]: debug-8: recv(0,1) call
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: pending=1 polling=5 next=0 fd=6 
op=0x00000001
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=0 fd=0 events=000201 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=1 fd=3 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=2 fd=4 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=3 fd=5 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=4 fd=6 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=5 ms=-1 sec=0 
usec=0
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=1
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=1 fd=3 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=2 fd=4 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=3 fd=5 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=4 fd=6 
status=000001
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: status=000001 fd=6 actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-8: recv(6,5) call
coshell [cs library]: debug-1: recv: 6: accept error [Invalid argument]
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: write(6,7) `#00000'
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=5 ms=-1 sec=0 
usec=0
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=1
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=0 fd=0 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=1 fd=3 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=2 fd=4 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=3 fd=5 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=4 fd=6 
status=000001
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: status=000001 fd=6 actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,7,EXACT) before
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,7,EXACT) [7] `#00027'
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,27,EXACT) before
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,27,EXACT) [27] 
`COATTRIBUTES=label=coshell'
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: pending=1 polling=5 next=4 fd=10 
op=0x00000010
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=0 fd=0 events=000201 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=1 fd=3 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=2 fd=4 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=3 fd=5 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=4 fd=6 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=5 ms=-1 sec=0 
usec=0
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=1
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=0 fd=0 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=1 fd=3 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=2 fd=4 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=3 fd=5 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=4 fd=6 
status=000001
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: status=000001 fd=6 actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,7,EXACT) before
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,7,EXACT) [7] `#00016'
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,16,EXACT) before
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,16,EXACT) [16] `S d - 10 (null)'
coshell: debug-10:level=10 output=/dev/stderr [Socket operation on non-socket]
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: write(6,6) `a 1 0'
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=5 ms=-1 sec=0 
usec=0
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=1
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=0 fd=0 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=1 fd=3 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=2 fd=4 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=3 fd=5 
status=000000
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: pending=1 polling=5 next=4 fd=6 
status=000001
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: csspoll: status=000001 fd=6 actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: read(6,7,EXACT) before
coshell [cs library]: debug-2: read(6,7,EXACT) eof
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: pending=1 polling=4 next=4 fd=6 
op=0x00000010 [Bad file descriptor]
Segmentation fault
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=0 fd=0 events=000201 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=1 fd=3 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=2 fd=4 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-9: cssfd: index=3 fd=5 events=000001 
actionf=0x418757
coshell [cs library]: debug-6: poll: 2011-04-20+15:50:58 num=4 ms=-1 sec=0 
usec=0

$ uname -a
Linux wvm1901 2.6.32-307-ec2 #12-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 18 13:14:51 UTC 2010 x86_64 
x86_64 i386-64 GNU/Linux

... any ideas as to what the problem might be?


Thanks in advance,

J.
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users

Reply via email to