More follow-up:

Thanks to Glenn Fowler for making a suggestion that I use a symbolic link to 
the root directory. I got past my original problem of the package command 
generating directory names beginning with "//" (e.g., //arc, //bin, etc.).  To 
get to this stage I created a symbolic link in my CygWin root directory and 
called it /ast which I targeted to  the root directory. Thus /ast ==> /

Before running the package command again I executed a "cd /ast"

This works to resolve my initial problem . But now I have others. Package 
generates some directory names that don't make sense (part of the directory 
chain doesn't exist or binaries actually exist in other directories. For 
example,

_RLD_ROOT=/ast/arch/cygwin.i386/arch::/
Export _RLD_ROOT

There isn't an arch subdirectory under /ast/arch/Cygwin.i386.    arch is 
located at /ast/arch.   It is not located at /ast/arch/Cygwin.i386/arch.

Another erroneously generated path is SHELL=/ast/arch/cygwin.i386/bin/sh.  sh 
exists in /ast/bin, not in /ast/arch/whatever...

After all the environment names and values are generated, I get to a debug line 
that says

Export VPATH

Following that, I get line after line of

package: <some environment name>: package archive not found.

<some environment name> is PACKAGEROOT, HOSTTYPE, SecureID, Token, Files, 
Files/Roxio and so on. Basically, every directory in the global Windows PATH 
setting is listed on its own line with the message from package telling me the 
archive is not found.

I thought the archive package was being pulled remotely from 
http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/ast-base.2011-02-08.cygwin.i386.tgz. So 
why is the package command looking for it on my local drive in all of the 
directories in the Windows PATH?


Richard Naff
Genesis Network Solutions, Abilene, TX
325-437-9186 Office
888-671-3711 Call-back pager
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Text pager

_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users

Reply via email to