cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: RE: [ast-users] [ksh93] Global `set -x' ? - tracing functions --------
> I am not even sure the ksh behaviour is compliant. > > DGK's comment is true as well; in practice we want some control to > exclude or include some functions. (Ksh specific discipline functions > is not exactly the way I'd have expected that to be achieved, though.) > > How is this not compliant. Since function is not in the standard, the behavior of function defined with function name is not specified by the standard. ksh93 scopes variables, traps, and some options in functions defined with the function reserved work. David Korn [email protected] _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
