On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:54:50 +0800 Clark Wang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:50, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > there was a post explaining this > > any ~(x:...) re-type switch to an 'x' form where ')' is not special will > > fail > > because the parser doesn't know where the pattern ends
> I saw that post. So we have to document it if we don't plan to fix it. it does need to be documented but "fix" implies "bug" in this case the syntax is a victim of circumstance _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
