On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:06:47 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote: > On 31 May 2012 21:12, Glenn Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > well I partailly misread the original request > > REG_REGEXP in <regex.h> is not hacked > > the original <regexp.h> was a hack > > the next release will have ~(V) for system V regexp
> ~(R) is already in use? > I really miss a description of ~(flags) in the output of --man for > ksh, grep, sed. its a placeholder for the pcre (perl compatible re) "(?R...)" which I don't recall what its functiuon is in ast its ignored _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
