On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:55 PM, David Korn <[email protected]> wrote:
> cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: [ast-developers] [ast-users] [ksh93] `>; ' never worked > before 2011-02-08? > -------- > > We don't have a testing team and rely heavily on users to test alpha > and beta releases. As the number of the early adoptors increases, > the reliability will improve. > > Most bug reports are handled promptly. We are planning to use > bugzilla for future bug reports. > Looking forward to that. > > ksh93u has been soaking for some time. There has been only one > bug report in the last two weeks. > > ksh93v- which will be released soon is likely to be less stable > initially, but has several new features and major code changes. > A lot of changes focus on threads. > > As far as I know >; does work correctly in all cases. If you > find any problem, please report it. > Maybe it's a Solaris specific issue? $ cat foo.ksh uname -a echo ${.sh.version} echo foo > file echo bar >> file /usr/bin/grep foo file >; file echo "\$?=$?" cat file $ ksh foo.ksh SunOS xxx 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v Solaris Version JM 93u 2011-02-08 $?=1 $ ksh foo.ksh SunOS xxx 5.11 snv_151a sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 Solaris Version JM 93t+ 2010-03-05 $?=1 $ ksh foo.ksh SunOS xxx 5.11 snv_151a sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 Solaris Version AJMP 93u+ 2012-06-28 $?=0 foo > > David Korn > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > ast-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers >
_______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
