Spam detection software, running on the system "mail-gray.research.att.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: I just found myself banned from the AST lists with a rejection
mail of *****SPAM***** Fwd: Your message to ast-@(developers|users) awaits.
Isn't this in violation of the US law where free speech is guaranteed? [...]
Content analysis details: (5.2 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
provider
(cedric.blancher[at]googlemail.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED
0.8 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
valid
0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
--- Begin Message ---
I just found myself banned from the AST lists with a rejection mail of
*****SPAM***** Fwd: Your message to ast-@(developers|users) awaits.
Isn't this in violation of the US law where free speech is guaranteed?
Ced
--
Cedric Blancher <[email protected]>
Institute Pasteur
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
