Hi: Their outgoing termination is different than their incoming DID's.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preston Garrison Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 2:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up Actually since they use companies like Level3 who hands off SIP, they don't need anything more then a media proxy. With the exception of needing to do things like voicemail, which SER actually has modules available to handle that. Preston Garrison direct: 877-748-4142 fax: 310-774-3901 cell: 623-748-4140 -----Original Message----- From: Yair Hakak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:26:33 +0200 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up I get the feeling that the vast majority of vonage calls are vonage->PSTN (which requires the SIP proxy to hand off to a gateway), not vonage<->vonage. Couple that with the fact that a large portion of vonage users are behind NATs (and STUN isn't exactly 100%) , and i start thinking that there is some vonage component (SER, asterisk, jasomi, whatever) in the media path in the majority of cases. In case of vonage<->vonage you're absoutely right (except for NAT). does this sound logical? -yair On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:09:18 -0800, steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > That is somewhat true but it is not the same as SER. Example: With SER > there is no codex translation. Vonage is using SER with over 500,000 users. > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve szmidt > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:34 AM > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up > > On Monday 28 March 2005 12:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Dan Iordanescu wrote: > > > If you define the sip users in sip.conf with: canreinvite=yes then * > > > behaves like SER; it's not in the middle anymore. Asterisk-users list > > > has a lot more on this stuff. > > > > Stick to selling epygi, Dan, that doesn't require thinking. > > That's uncalled for Alex. > > If someone does not understand then try to educate or at least offer > constructive critisism. > > -- > > Steve Szmidt > > "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety." > Benjamin Franklin > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Biz mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Biz mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
