Alex,
RTPproxy and ser is indeed not asterisk but it is handling RTP, at over
80mbit/s
All i wanted to say with that is that the limit he thinks he's reaching
on the dual xeon is not the memory bandwidth as he is way below that limit.
/Z
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Zoa wrote:
Strange thing, those gigabit nics for x86. Strange thing those linux
routers capable of handling a lot of packets. Strange things those 2000
simultaneous calls on rtpproxy on x86.
rtpproxy and ser is not asterisk.
Dont blame it on the hardware, blame it on the sysadmin if your dual
xeon can only handle 80mbit/s on its network card.
handling 80mbps of RTP traffic is not the same as handling 80mbps of
static files.
A xeon has 6,4 gb bandwidth, which would mean that if we followed your
logics, we could roughly do 5000 calls using g729 codec on a machine
with similar hardware. (as the g729 uses less bandwidth than the g711,
you are not encoding anyway).
Didnt you say last time you would publish the actual test setup 'in a
week' ? Still waiting here.
I cannot check your claims of 5000 calls as i dont have an SGI, but
everything i can check in your press report sounds like complete *...
Gee i wonder why im a non believer for those 5000 calls.
Give us the details of the test and make me happy by proving me wrong.
I agree with you, however, you also need to pay attention to details...
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
