My understanding was that skype does not need to provide 9-1-1... hrmmm. UGH... any thoughts on how to do this without draining the pocketbook with asterisk?
On 5/19/05, Don Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One problem is that a phone represents IMPLIED access to 911. > If an emergency occurs will a member of that household be thinking > about what phone has access. Especially a child. > Train the household as to which phones to use and put a large label "911". > Sounds reasonable, but the govt will not leave to chance that we will train > our own households.(as it should) > But, how may hold fire drills? > It looks like we can not get around the fact of what a physical phone > represents.. > > . > > > This should be interesting. > > What if we are "long distance" only? > > I have many customers with a T1 to Sprint and no local calling (its either > > LD or 800). > > They have 911 through the LEC with traditional POTS lines. > > > /asterisk-biz > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Biz mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
