Well, this is getting silly, I'm sure the casual reader of the list will be able to draw their own inferences. Response inline.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: > > a) I did not say access charges don't exist. Read the email. I said > > recip is almost gone, and where it exists, it is in the range of > > 0.05c/minute. (as in, 1/20th of a penny). > > > I asked about access charges you said they didnt exist. It cant be any > more clear than that. But hey if you feel the need to defend your > stupidity after the fact by all means, but please try and learn > something. Read the email. I said, and I quote: "Nobody really has recips anymore [...]". > > b) Rural carriers operate by entirely different rules from the rest. > > You were looking for a CLEC to give you PRIs. By definition, rural > > carrier *is* an ILEC. Please do not try to confuse issues. > > > Those were only brought up becuase you proved that you didnt know basic > telephony. If you read the original email you will see I never > mentioned a rural telephone company it was only after your 'you are on > crack' comment that I brought that up. > > Had you not insisted that access charges were nonexistant in the first > place and responded later with 'you are on crack' I would not have > brought them up. Nice how you combine the 3rd email with the first to > prove your point. Too bad you really dont know anything about what you > are talking about as indicated by your utter lack of understanding on > the issues from even this morning. Woot, namecalling galore. > > > c) You wanted a CLEC with recip - talk about clecs who still have > > recip. Don't bring up rural ILECs' access tariffs. > > > if you read the original email I fiurst said access charge, I appended > reciprocol compensation becuase many people who claim to know telephony > basics dont know anything about what I am talking about and I didnt want > to have to explain it, but you forced me to explain it to you by > insisting that you didnt know what you were talking about. It is *reciproCAL*. > > d) Notwithstanding the above, since you made claims to contrary: > > Access tariff by definition is LD (anything going between rate > > centers) and is specified in the tariffs. Access tariff may be > > different for intralata / intrastate / interstate. Reciprocal > > compensation is by definition local (intra-rate-center), is > > individually negotiated and specified in ICA. Arguing otherwise is > > pointless. > > > So you are saying there are no access charges for local calls? Or are > you just implying that but not actually trying to say it so you can have > an out later on when you try to jumble the emails up? There are no access fees for intra-rate-center calls, correct. If there were, they would be called reciprocal compensation. -alex _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
