On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 01:30 -0500, Jeremy McNamara wrote: > trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > > > > >legally speaking hearsay is repeating what you heard, not claiming you > >did an overt action. This is not hearsay, regardless of whether its > >correct or not. > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay says differently. > I would trust almost anything more than wikipedia. I didnt read the article itself on wikipedia, but trust that you have and properly conveyed what it said.
http://www.utcourts.gov/resources/glossary.htm hearsay - Second-hand evidence, generally consisting of a witness's testimony that he/she heard someone else say something. Granted that is the utah state court website, I believe it to be more valuable than wikipedia in this instance. Just to be sure lets go federal ... http://www.uscourts.gov/journalistguide/glossary.html Hearsay – Evidence presented by a witness who did not see or hear the incident in question but heard about it from someone else. With some exceptions, hearsay generally is not admissible as evidence at trial. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
