Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:I should have been more clear. I was talking about the IP301 which doesn't have a full-duplex speakerphone. (Something I can't really understand)Huh? The IP301 can't really be considered a Speaker Phone, as it hasnomicrophone whatsoever. Full Duplex, Half Duplex don't apply when youhaveone way audio and no Microphone.Exactly my point. I was annoyed about the Polycom IP301 not having a speaker phone or as Polycom likes to say "Not a full-duplex speakerphone". I don't understand why they would build the IP301 like it is, without amicrophone.
Marketing I think. They wanted the three models to have different features, give customers more reasons to choose.
The IP 500, 600, 501 and 601 have GREAT speakerphones, which farsurpassthe Cisco 7960 in quality and tonality. While Cisco may have licensed
Actually Polycom did a good job giving the phones different sound quality. We tested the three models next to each other, and the quality improved noticably with each model. I think the 7960 gets pretty close to a 500, but the 600 is really in another class. Ron Arts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
