James Sharp a écrit :
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Mark wrote:
monitors (leaving to the satellite and the return from the satellite)
That delay would apply that to voice packets both coming and going,
and I really dont know how anyone could carry on a normal phone
conversation under those circumstances..
I guess I should have qualified my entire question. It was late and I
was half-asleep.
I work for a satellite company and we already have uplink facilities
and space segments on several satellites (Including Intelsat 701, that
can see out into Africa and parts of the Middle East from our uplink
on the US East Coast). I'm trying to get a feel for the market to see
if its worth our time pursuing clients and customers in those areas
for voip termination.
I think, definitely. For VoIP, the perfect provider would be:
* Somebody who can give a block of static IP addresses (since NAT + VoIP
= pain).
* Somebody who can give a symetrical, high speed burstable bandwith for
VoIP.
* "Pay as you grow" invoicing, where the invoice depends on the amount
of data which has been exchanged.
In other words, it would be nice to have a provider which offers generic
access with network contention but also has the option of giving high
priority to certain type of traffic and bill for it accordingly.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
