out of curiosity, is DIDx or anyone involved paying you to support them. ---- Shidan Gouran
On 2/8/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 01:10 -0600, Mark wrote: > > I doubt that! See how you "own" the DID when a shifty seller drops out > > of DIDx! DIDx does not protect the buyer when a seller leaves the DIDx > > syste. > > > they claim they do in their faq, where if it doesnt work for the month > due to that you get a refund or something. I recall a post from linda I > think on that not that long ago. > > Most carriers can change your did at will, broadvoice for example > changed someones tollfree for no aparent reason, information of that was > posted to this list about the same time as the comments on their faq, > maybe a month ago. > > > > > attempting to use scare tactics against me for excercising my rights of > > free speech based solely on the facts of my experience with their > > you should reread the constitution, you dont have an absolute right to > speech in america, private entities can curtail that freely, think of a > movie theater where you can be removed if you talk during the movie. > Then there are other limitations, such as you cant yell 'fire' in a > crowded theater, etc. > > The first amendment is a limitation on the government not a priviledge > granted to you, its a symantic difference but one that need to be > understood if you want to understand the meaning and intent of the > amendment. > > And lastly something that most people dont seem to understand is that a > right to speech doesnt guarantee a right to be heard. > > > > organization. This "notice" was served via email which I do not believe > > is a valid form for serving a legal notice in any US State, although I > > am not an attorney, so I may be wrong. > > > It is providing it is delivered to the correct person. You can > obviously try to challenge it as 'defective service' but by doing that > you admit that you infact got it. But its too late to try to say that > you didnt get it now, your post that you were infact served is now > archived all over the net :) assuming it was actually service and not > just a more informal notice. > > To prove this is accepted by the courts, well sorta (I dont recall the > exact cite, but google does have it indexed somewhere) a lawyer > challenged notice in court saying the email was lost (he didnt appear in > the first place) - he wasnt saying it wasnt sent, because he cant prove > that, only saying that he never received it - something no one else can > prove under normal circumstances. This was last summer iirc. > > > -- > Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel > UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 > US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 > FreeWorldDialup: 635378 > http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQBD6aAh+1olxlzQw5cRAtPKAJ93IaW7D7yP6r+wavMuqV8WHR+2LwCfWQZ7 > +rhplbb18zaCQLEPNFReXv4= > =nmFf > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-biz mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
