not only that but voice chat over internet worked with aim back when i was in highschool, skype's only claim to fame is that it always worked and they used wideband audio. And I will put a good deal of money on the line that skype will not release an open api that will allow asterisk to work with it, so there will be no chan_skype in "a few months."
Mog On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 19:19 +0100, Peter Bowyer wrote: > FWD came later than Skype? Jeff would have something to say about that > - check your history books. > > On 09/08/06, AmberVoIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > skype was first > > yes, in msn messenger we can use pc2phone features, but microsoft never > > did campaign for it. > > FWD, gizmo and gtalk came later. > > chan_skype i guess will appear in few months, open libraries is > > released, so... > > > > andy. > > > > On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:53:43 -0500 > > mogorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Im not saying we should ignore skype they have several features, well > > > one feature, ease of use that we should strive to have. But otherwise > > > there is nothing in skype we don't have else where and even the ease > > > of use is just as easy when you can just give someone a google talk > > > client and connect it to asterisk. I'm not saying we should ignore > > > skype i just don't see anything they have given us to work with and > > > don't see the point in waiting or trying to build chan_skype at least > > > as it is now. > > > > > > Mog > > > On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:23 +0100, AmberVoIP wrote: > > > > You can look skype forums, for 2004 and 2005th, there was many > > > > diwscussions... Skype guys made closed protocol, and i beleive, soon > > > > they will provide interconnection from sip or maybe iax2. > > > > Anyway, it was made for commerce. > > > > > > > > I do not use skype, i just do not want one more additional IM > > > > client at computer. Right now all IM clients is under GAIM, gizmo > > > > registered at asterisk and working well. > > > > > > > > I ignoring skype. > > > > > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0400 > > > > Bill Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ahem. Like maybe people need to get over Microsoft? > > > > > > > > > > I think I understand how you feel, but doesn't ignoring Skype > > > > > seem a bit, uh, Ostrich-like? > > > > > > > > > > mogorman wrote: > > > > > > Sounds to me like skype needs to get its act together, > > > > > > or people need to get over skype. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > > > > > > > asterisk-biz mailing list > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > > > > > asterisk-biz mailing list > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > > > asterisk-biz mailing list > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > asterisk-biz mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz > > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
