Matthew Rubenstein wrote: >On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 19:45 -0500, Paul wrote: > > >>Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: >> >> >> >>>On 12/22/06, *Paul* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> >>> See my post saying I was joking. Anyway, a battery or supercap takes >>> care of that. It doesn't take long to erase something as short a a key >>> pair. Another approach is to trigger some thermite and let the heat do >>> the job. Or maybe the EMP from a nuclear explosion ..... >>> >>> >>>ust have to make sure that you cant read the data after erasure. >>>Magnetic media (hard drives for example) typically can be read via >>>automated means to get several generations of the data that was >>>there. The cost is suprisingly low to get data off a harddrive given >>>its level of automation currently. Temper that against hte cost of >>>making such a system ... >>> >>>As for the emp of a nuclear explosion, a small nuke placed within the >>>case to create the emp is likely to damage the equipment first, so the >>>emp would be useless ... Why not use a flux compression generator, >>>that way you arent shipping nuclear material that could be stolen and >>>used in a power plant somewhere, we cant have that can we? >>> >>> >>Design a dynamic photonic memory device. The data is stored in dancing >>photons. Opening the case turns on a lamp which floods the dance floor >>with more photons. They bump into each other and lose the beat. A riot >>breaks out. Photonic cops arrive with a nuclear device ..... >> >> > > Use a time-flux capacitor to go "back" and stop yourself from >installing the system, once you've finished using it. > > Only Kilgore Trout would know the best thing to do.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
