1. The case in question about H.264 seems to indicate that maybe 1
pattent on H.264 is invalid, there are many.
2. H.264 is a video codec, not an audio codec, so I suppose you
could encode audio on it if you wanted to plot the audio signal on a
graph and encode that, but not sure how useful that would be
(shamelessly stolen from a certain spandsp author).
If your really looking for a good codec that isn't encumbered by patents
similar to g729, look at speex. It is the best alternative with similar
characteristics.
Mike
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:33 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand
(MIPS:Kbps) and
> > audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is
higher quality
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
