Send asterisk-biz mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-biz digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: OT:Any guy from Teliax here? (Mike Benoit)
2. UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed (adi)
3. Re: UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed
(Rehan Allah Wala)
4. Re: UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed
(Mitul Limbani)
5. Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented* (Matthew Rubenstein)
6. Re: Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
(Trixter aka Bret McDanel)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:04:04 +0000
From: Mike Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] OT:Any guy from Teliax here?
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Interesting, I've been with Teliax for over 2years now and the one thing
I have always been able to depend on is that my emails have always been
answered and my phone calls have also always been answered with almost 0
on-hold time.
They have been great for me and I would recommend them to anyone. No
doubt they have had growing pains in the past, about 2 months ago they
stopped accepting Canadian credit cards for a few weeks, so I had to use
paypal, but they were upfront about the issue and did fix it eventually.
Excellent company to do business with.
n Fri, 2007-01-26 at 00:44 +0700, Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
I tested Teliax service for sometime. This service has good comments
on this forum. The quality is OK, but all phone calls and emails are
not answered. We are provider seeking quality routes. If any guy from
Teliax out there, please contact
phong(dot)nguyen(at)vienthongso(dot)com.
Thanks
--
With best regards,
Nguyen
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
--
Mike Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070126/cc712781/attachment-0001.pgp
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:09:55 +0530
From: "adi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling channels
needed
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi
We need UK fixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we
will pay a fixed amount per month per line.
We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for
Australia land lines as well.
Regards
Adi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/5a652bbe/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:47:22 -0800
From: "Rehan Allah Wala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling
channels needed
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
broadvoice.com
Hi
We need UKfixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we
will pay a fixed amount
per month per line.
We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for
Australia land lines as well.
Regards
Adi
Super Technologies Inc., Pensacola, Florida
http://www.SuperTec.com - Technologies from tomorrow, Today!
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: Rehan33
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you
win." By Mahatma Gandhi.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/af18eeba/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:52:49 +0530
From: Mitul Limbani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling
channels needed
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed"
Adi,
Well its gonna be same, 1 E1 with 30 lines shall be able to populate a
volume of roughly close to 1.5M - 2.0M minutes/month, so if you are
ready to pay all that amount upfront, thats all the more better :) we
can provide you with a fixed costs with a upper ceiling of 2M
mins/month, let me know if thats fine, we can then provide you with a
FIXED Cost per month in prepaid mode. Contact me off the list.
Thanks & Regards,
Mitul Limbani,
Founder & CEO,
Enterux Solutions,
The Enterprise Linux Company (TM),
www.enterux.com
Quoting adi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
We need UK fixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min,
we will pay a fixed amount per month per line.
We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this
for Australia land lines as well.
Regards
Adi
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:15:04 -0500
From: Matthew Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-biz] Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
To: Lee Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Asterisk-Biz <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:33 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
> The H.264 codec patent by Qualcomm has been ruled invalid by a San
> Diego Federal jury:
> http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197001066
> .
> That means that H.264 codecs can now be written, distributed and
> revised
> freely under any license their authors choose, including GPL, public
> domain, or any other, and $free now that royalties are no longer
> required.
>
> How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand (MIPS:Kbps) and
> audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is higher
> quality
> (tho patented with at least $10 per running codec instance royalties).
> Will H.264 become the favorite high-quality Asterisk codec, or will it
> perhaps force G.729 to become free, or negligibly cheaper?
Although I wouldn't complain about a free G.729 codec, I have to be
honest in saying that $10.00 isn't that great of an expense considering
the better call quality you get.
It's a question of scale. If I've got a Pentium that can handle 400
unencoded legs max, by the time I get through with multiparty
conferences, streaming and maybe recording unencoded, I might have only
50-75 simul calls, which is about $650 in codec licenses on a $650 PC.
That's cheap in terms of value, but expensive in terms of cost.
Especially if I want to run thousands of simul calls, which doubles my
5-figure cost to 6-figures. While I'd rather spend the money on
operations staff and developers who can add features and reliability.
--
(C) Matthew Rubenstein
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:50:45 +0000
From: "Trixter aka Bret McDanel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
Discussion" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:33 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand
(MIPS:Kbps) and
> > audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is higher
quality
I just caught this but oh well. GSM as used in asterisk has patent
claims
by philips. It expires this June or July I forget, Philips seems to have
stopped trying to enforce their patent claims on the very library asterisk
uses, but right now technically using it without a license could get you
sued (only part of the gsm codec is claimed to be patented).
The newer GSM 6.10 which afaik asterisk does not support although there
might be 3rd party people doing it has additional patents on the AMR parts
of it. Those dont expire so quickly.
--
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/d1239651/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
End of asterisk-biz Digest, Vol 30, Issue 61
********************************************
