Senad Jordanovic wrote: >Alistair Cunningham wrote: > > >>Patrick wrote: >> >> >>>Alistair, >>> >>>It seems your solution does not support graceful fail-over from calls >>>*in progress*. Is that correct? >>> >>> >>Patrick, >> >>That is correct. Calls in progress may be dropped, but if callers >>immediately call back they will be routed through a surviving server. >>We have never had a paying or serious prospective customer who has >>considered this inadequate. >> >> > >We have had some customers asking for full fault tolerance, hence why the >ftRACK is available. > >For example: > >Stock broker dealer on trading floor may loose millions should a call drop >during a deal close. > >Insurance companies recording the claims calls are another type of the >industry. > >Etc... > >Of course many other factors may drop the call, but at least the server will >not be that factor. :-) > > > Guys, thanks for the clarification.
I guess a psychic hotline service would know exactly what to expect :) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
