On 2/9/07, Alistair Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > I am still wondering about the original 60,000 user claim, that can be > revealed but the user base doesnt allow for concurrent calls per box to > be revealed? Trixter, That's correct. We've been asked by some prospective customers how many users our largest existing customers have, so we found out and got permission from the customers concerned to share this information. We never asked if we could share the concurrent call information, so I won't. I think that's the ethical thing to do.
I still hold by the rest of what I said which is that there is a big difference between a "grandma" user (one who makes or receives very few calls) and a call center or telemarketing company who is doing tons of concurrent calls, which makes the 60,000 user number basically worthless without concurrent call numbers. As such, since you asked before for marketing purposes to get a total user count, could you get a total call count (perhaps with ALOC info, how many systems that was spread across, is the concurrent call counter a sustained number or peak, what is the average, etc). Numbers that equate to something more tangable than users that may or may not be placing calls through the system. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200 http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
