Matt wrote: > EXACTLY MY POINT!!! There shouldn't be that many bugs. Look at QMail > for an example of ONE PERSON who is writing software that is secure and > bug free as well as free and open source.
And how much functionality was added to that project over the same period of time? How many new endpoints is the software having to be made compatible with as they appear (and get buggy firmware updates, etc.)? If you want thoroughly tested bug-free versions of Asterisk, then you need to be willing to compensate someone to create them for you. Digium's team spends a great deal of time doing just that, along with running our business, merging contributions from the community, creating new functionality on our own, etc. but there are limits to what any small team of people can do. Keep in mind also that Asterisk has only been an officially released product for just over two years; I believe if you look back at QMail's track record (or any FOSS project's track record) over its first two years of public usage you'll find that 'bumps in the road' are par for the course. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
