Isn't this blockage a "network neutrality" issue? Clearing it might be covered under existing laws, but if it's a matter of "f* it, I'll pay the fine", then the laws aren't working. It would seem to be a paradigm of exactly the kind of anticompetitive practice the telcos are claiming cannot happen on the Internet, even as they seek to protect their power to do it anywhere, any time.
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:48 +0000, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > > > On 3/20/07, Dean Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070319-attcingular-blocks-cellular-customers-from-free-conference-call-services.html > > > > I'm kind of confused, Cingular has to pay if I dial my 'Aunt' > in Iowa correct? So are they allowed to block her service from > being contacted by cingular phones as well? > > Why isn't the FCC being called in to stop this? > > If they have an issue then renegotiate the rates properly > through legal channels. > > > > > there is a movement to halt this, alledgly its not just cingular but > also qwest and others (although someone tried last night from qworst > and it worked). The movement involves contacting your atty general as > well as the FCC. > > Qwest and AT&T are also withholding payments in violation of FCC > rules. This is all related to the AT&T lawsuit, which I am sure will > get far uglier before it gets any better. > > > > -- > Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel > Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200 > http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you! > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-biz mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz -- (C) Matthew Rubenstein _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
