I would say it depends. 

If you keep it to a review of facts and avoid slander and more 
importantly, it directly relates to this community, I would say post.

Again, just stick to the facts and keep emotion out.

Thanks,
Steve

Danny Froberg wrote:
> Sahil,
>
> It's usually not a good idea.
> Every transaction is a calculated risk, minimizing that risk is good
> business practice.
> If you get burnt, although regrettable it's an indicator you might want to
> review your procedures rather than flaunt their flaws.
>
> My 2c :)
>
> /Danny 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sahil Gupta
> Sent: den 29 oktober 2007 06:51
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [asterisk-biz] Bad Apples?
>
> Hi,
> Question out of interest, a semi-active list member appears to be a bad 
> payer and happens to be avoiding calls at the same time.
>
> Would it be acceptable to publish their name here?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Sahil Gupta
> Chief Executive Officer
> VoiceValley Group of Companies
>
> Phone: +61-7-30188403
> Fax: +61-7-30188499
>
>   


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

Reply via email to