>From what I heard at astri(dev?)con, this isn't quite right. On some OS's multiple threads can read from the same UDP port. These threads can be spread over multiple processors.
I heard this from one of the Sun guys, so I'm assuming that this works in Solaris. From what I remember it doesnt in Linux 2.6, but that's not to say it never would. Tim (straying into tech talk....) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trixter aka Bret McDanel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: 16 January 2008 15:05:46 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] IAX Channels limit on Asterisk 1.4.17 On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:44 -0600, Bob Pierce wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 11:26 +0100, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > > These are some of the biggest reasons I personally avoid iax. I just > > dont consider this type of bottlenecking to be 'carrier class'. It is > > an inherent problem of using a single port for UDP (connectionless > > really) communications. > > Trixter, > > Thanks for explaining these IAX issues so clearly. I had been tending to > lean towards using IAX, but what you are saying makes perfect sense. It has its place, and that issue is fine for a soho pbx they shouldnt ever get to the point where bottle necking is a problem, its the carrier side of things that tends to have issues because of that. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200 http://www.trxtel.com the phone company that pays you! _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
