On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:30:29PM +0200, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > dtmf in asterisk (rfc2833) violates the rfc. There are many switches > that usually are only "big carrier types" that do not properly deal with > what asterisk sends. I gave oej specifics as he was doing something > relating to a filed bug on this issue. I even wrote a patch, but until > asterisk is no longer released gpl I cant contribute it (personal thing > just as some wont contribute unless its gpl I wont contribute if it is).
Just curious why you look at it that way, Bret. The only reason I could see why someone would decline to contribute to a GPLd project would seem to be handily dealt with merely by dual-licensing your code GPL and BSD. On the other hand, it may be that you're complaining about *having to assign your copyright to Digium*, which would be an entirely different issue: you would be unhappy that they could then themselves dual-license it commercially. Is that the situation that troubles you? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
