Mike It is the firmware driver that activates this. It is only for the g729 though as far as I know. I do not the g723 so I am not sure on this.
>From Digium Site The TCE400B decompresses G.729a (8.0kbit) or G.723.1 (5.3kbit/6.0kbit) into G.711 u-law or a-law; or compresses G.711 u-law or a-law into G.729a (8.0kbit) or G.723.1 (5.3kbit). The TCE400B is rated to handle up to 120 bi-directional G.729a transformations or 92 bi-directional G.723.1 transformations. The TCE400B does not require additional licensing fees for the use of these codecs nor does it require the registration process association with Digium's software-based G.729a codec licensing. ---------------------------------------- From: "Mike" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:23 AM To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card Is there a config I need to put in to get to 120? Or does the firmware control that, and I got sold an old card by my distributor last week? Mike From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryant Zimmerman Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:19 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card Mike On G729 they do 120 with their current firmware. Bryant ---------------------------------------- From: "Mike" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:16 AM To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card Sorry to sort of hijack this thread, but isn't Digium transcoding only able to get up to 92 sessions, not 120? Or did I buy the wrong card? Mike From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Klang Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:31 AM To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card On Oct 29, 2010, at 9:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: Hi, Does anyone have experience with Digium vs. Sangoma transcoding cards ? From experience Sangoma has been a lot harder to integrate with Asterisk. Wondering what the plus side may be to using Sangoma over Digium. Unfortunately the Sangoma transcoder integration with Asterisk is still significantly harder to integrate than the Digium product. The Sangoma card has a loopback network interface and audio is streamed to it via RTP, meaning that you have to have a private, local subnet for each Sangoma transcoder card. However, the big advantage is that Sangoma can get up to 480 sessions in a single card (D100-480) vs. the ~120 that you get with Digium. If you are needing large concurrencies then Sangoma has a strong advantage. /BAK/ -- Ben Klang Chief Visionary Verendus 404.475.4841 [email protected] Insightful Technology Solutions Regards, Dovid -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
