+1 for GitHub. We used gitlab internally for about two years. Works well 
overall, but they put out updates about every 18 seconds and it becomes a lot 
of work to keep it fully up-to-date. Recently decided to throw in the towel and 
move everything to Amazon’s CodeCommit. Zero issues so far and free for first 5 
devs.
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> On 17/01/2017 21:01, AFShin Seysan wrote:
>> nowadays, github.com <http://github.com/> is probably the most popular place 
>> for any source code.
>> 
>> You can also use Atlasian products, which for opensource would be free, you 
>> can use Confluence for documentation, Bitbucket for source control and Jira 
>> for Issue Tracking.
>> Let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Github.com is indeed popular and serves the most needs of dealing with open 
> source project development and collaboration (issue tracker, pull requests, 
> reviews, etc...). But of course, you don't have full control and sometimes 
> you reach some limitations. At kamailio we had to write some script) to hook 
> into their APIs because we wanted a special email format for notifications as 
> well as keep a mirror in near real time (for who is interested to read more, 
> I published it as OSS: https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub 
> <https://github.com/miconda/gitpushub>). Another limitation is not offering 
> private repository without paying. As an OSS project, sometimes you want to 
> keep few admin scripts private.
> 
> Bitbucket offers private repos for free. I haven't used it much and not 
> integrated with Jira/Confluence. So it might not be the case there, but I 
> find it a hassle not to have the issue tracker, version control, review 
> system in the same portal for an OSS project -- it can add overhead to 
> administration, taking cycles from other OSS activities. We did it in the 
> past and I would not return there. The story can be different if you have 
> dedicated sysadmin resources.
> 
> Gitlab.com is another alternative for hosting OSS project -- I haven't used 
> it, so no first hand experience. But Gitlab can be also self-hosted (the 
> suite of tools used there is open source), however it is seems to require a 
> dedicated system for an easy installation and maintenance, be safe to not 
> break other services.
> 
> gogs.io is a lighter version for self hosting git repositories and get the 
> look and many of the features a la github (issue tracker, wiki, ...).
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- 
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com 
> <http://www.kamailioworld.com/>-- 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

Reply via email to