its a long time since I tried that but as I recall asterisk hung on exit.
But as you say lthread works a lot better than libc. I did ask many months
ago for peoole to feed back on trying lthread with a view of changing the
asterisk port but nobody did.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dinesh Nair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk on BSD discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] The future of 4.X support was [zaptel-bsd]
On 09/27/05 14:06 Luigi Rizzo said the following:
if you can take over mainteinance for 4.x, that would be
great. I am just afraid that it will probably need to be
outside the main freebsd ports tree.
consider it done. in as much as possible, i'll try to track/port the
zaptel freebsd port to work on 4.x, as i've been doing for our own
implementations.
This said, asterisk itself has some issues with the thread
library on 4.x, and while i have been using it for months now,
could you elaborate on this ? i've built asterisk linked against
lthread[1] instead of libc_r and havent seen any major bugbears yet. this
has been tested up to 200 simultaneous calls doing Monitor().
[1] a simple modification of some of the Makefiles from asterisk in ports.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do
|
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do
|
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."
|
| done; done
|
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
