On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0500, Kim Culhan wrote: ... > Take a look at the effort taken to cause it to install in the 'standard > FreeBSD > places': ... > While you're there, take a look at all the other work they've done to make it > Do The Right Thing on FreeBSD: > > ifeq ($(OSARCH),FreeBSD) > BSDVERSION=$(shell make -V OSVERSION -f > $(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk) > ASTCFLAGS+=$(shell if test $(BSDVERSION) -lt 500016 ; then echo > "-D_THREAD_SA > FE"; fi) > LIBS+=$(shell if test $(BSDVERSION) -lt 502102 ; then echo "-lc_r"; else > ech > o "-pthread"; fi) > ifneq ($(wildcard $(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include/spandsp),) > ASTCFLAGS+=-I$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include/spandsp > endif > MPG123TARG=freebsd > > With all these measures taken to enable pain-free compilation on FreeBSD > who needs the port ?
well, apart from the fact that i contributed quite a few of these changes, there are other patches that i have are not being committed because they are considered as FreeBSD bugs, not asterisk bugs; or because the committers don't have time to analyse them. It took me months to get the chan_oss.c in. The port is needed if you want to build asterisk-current on 4.11, or if you want a clean -Werror compile, etc. cheers luigi _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
