On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:54:39PM +0400, Vahan Yerkanian wrote: > Greetings folks, > > I'd like to inquiry on how many of you are using the mpg123 on your > FreeBSD Asterisk installations and how useful you think this dependency > for the Asterisk port is? Personally for me, leaving MoH as it is per > out-of-ports install causes mpg123 processes eat CPU 100% under FreeBSD > 6.0... I've switched to native format MoH since 1.1 and haven't looked > back for mpg123. Was wondering if we really want to have it installed as > a dependency at all for the /usr/ports/net/asterisk. At least having a > WITHOUT_MPG123 switch in the makefile could help us keep our port list > as minimal as possible.
if you try the asterisk-devel port, it does not have that and a few other dependencies, and it uses either the trunk code or a branch with some modifications of mine that i am using on FreeBSD. yes there is a problem with mpg123 because the parent (asterisk) process doesn't handle interaction with the children (mpg123) properly, at least on freebsd. a change was committed last summer, but backed out because it caused some problem on linux. i gave up on tracking the issue because i don't use mpg123 or moh anyways. cheers luigi p.s. we are now in a rather long ports freeze in freebsd so for the next couple of weeks there are basically no commits allowed to the ports tree > What's your opinion? > > As a non-related side note, I just succeeded in receiving a multipage > fax over g711(alaw) / 9600 fax passthru connection (non-T38) from a > panasonic fax machine using rxfax/spandsp installed via current asterisk > port. Both adapter and the * server were on a dedicated CIDR LAN subnet. > > Best regards, > Vahan > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
