I agree with all of this. I guess I get by because I know the underlying asterisk config and can fix anything that isn't working one way or another. And I am not using queues or faxing or anything really fancy. Just call switching and auto-attendant.
j On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Shawn O'Connor wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > My problem with the @home product is that it seems like they don't QA > their releases. So, one release will be produced and queues won't be > working, the next release the digital receptionist won't work but queues > will be working. Then, the next those two will be fixed but fax support > will be broken. > > The other big problem that I have is that there's no clear migration > path from semi-broken version to semi-broken version. Everyone seems to > say, take screen shots, blow it away, and reinstall. Egads! With a > normal asterisk install, I can control the upgrade process quite nicely. > > I will agree that the linux zaptel modules are more stable than the > freebsd. I wonder if the sangoma hardware modules with FreeBSD asterisk > are the way to go. Anyone have good input on that? > > -Shawn > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-BSD mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd > > !DSPAM:443d405e178151677836674! > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
