On 06/18/06 23:32 Jason Lixfeld said the following:
This begets another question: What's the deal with the misc/zaptel port? Why is it so out of date? We're so close now, all we need is a working zaptel port and a fix to the net/asterisk/Makefile to remove that i386 zaptel limitation, and we're off to the races, no?
i really dont know. as one of the developers of zaptel-bsd, it irritates me that i have to tell folk to pull it down from subversion as opposed to the port.
-- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-BSD mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
